Fairness for private sector

Enterprises in Vietnam’s private economic sector have not received land and taxation incentives while they are restrained by institutional regulations, policies and thousands of procedures and formalities

“Equality” was one of the 10 key words given by Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc to private enterprises during Vietnam Private Sector Economic Forum held in Hanoi on May 2. Equality, explained the Prime Minister, is to give the private economic sector fairness before the law, and equitability in competition and in resource allocation versus other sectors, in particular, accessiblity to capital, technology, management and human resources.

However, in practical terms, inequality in resource allocation has been a serious hurdle to the development of the country’s private economic sector.

Contrasting pictures

In recent years, the private economy has emerged as one of the key growth drivers pulling along the entire economy as it accounted for some 42% of Vietnam’s gross domestic product, created 30% of the national budget and provided jobs for some 85% of the country’s labor pool. Despite all the improvements, the real strength of this economic sector is basically “weak and scattered.” A few private business groups have been formed. However, they don’t have the ability to turn the tables.

A prerequisite for the development of the private sector and its larger contribution to the national economy relates to the existence of big business groups which are forceful enough to support the rest of the corporate sector in moving forward. This model has been proved successful in South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan and suchlike.

In Vietnam, however, during the past decade, although the contingent of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has expanded, the number of big business groups has remained unchanged. “The economy accommodates way too many SMEs and business households,” said Nguyen Minh Cuong, an economist with the Asian Development Bank (ADB). “This should be a source of concern.” Statistically, up to 95-97% of Vietnam’s total enterprises are small businesses or microenterprises. It’s therefore very tough for them to engage in global supply chains.

Dang Quang Khoi, director of An Lap Plastic Co., a second-tier supplier for a big electronic company in Vietnam, said of the dozens of plastic product suppliers of foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs) present here, only two of them are “pure” Vietnamese companies. “This situation poses a big risk because our output is mainly for the foreign investment sector,” said Khoi.

Human resources, technology and management, according to Khoi, are the challenges his 300-strong company has been facing. Citing human resources as an example, he said his company’s work force changes on the daily basis. Some employees quit even before they finished their training at An Lap although Khoi had paid them salaries and allowances equal to the common level in the industry, he said. As the quality of its staff is not high, his company’s managerial level is not high either. “It’s extremely tough for us to fill high-level management vacancies,” said Khoi. “We have to train senior workers to fill the posts. But these people lack managerial competence as well as other skills.”

Shortages of human resources and capital have barred SMEs from investing in state-of-the-art technology, which significantly dents their competitiveness and deprives them of the opportunity to take part in global supply chains. Uneven quality of services and products is the major obstacle which keeps private SMEs from entering into global supply chains in the context that the international marketplace has set ever-higher standards on the environment and health, according to the representative from the ADB.

In dire contrast with the skinny body of local private enterprises are robust FIEs. The foreign investment sector has grown continuously and cranked up pressure on their local counterparts. FIEs have developed robustly partly because they enjoy overwhelming advantages over their private domestic rivals, like finance, management, market strength, technology and the ability to engage in global supply chains.

However, the crux of the issue—according to Tran Dinh Thien, an economist who is a member of the Prime Minister’s group of economic advisers, a thinktank—is that FIEs know how to maximize incentives given by Vietnam to foreign investors. In addition to natural treatments, such as abundant work force, low costs, geographical locations as well as market scale and growth rate, other important policy incentives are land accessibility, taxation reduction and exemption, and competition among provinces.

“These incentives are totally unavailable to private Vietnamese enterprises,” said Thien. “Vietnamese enterprises are tied up and restrained by institutional regulations, policies and specific stipulations on bank interest rates, foreign exchange rates and thousands of formalities and procedures.”

Discrimination does not exist in the words and phrases of laws and regulations but in the mindset and relationship between management agencies and private enterprises, according to Dien Quang Hiep, chairman of the Binh Duong Wood Association and chairman of Minh Phat 2 Company. “When shifting from a planned economy to a market one, Vietnam’s laws were changed fast because they are only written documents,” Hiep said. “But the most difficult change is what people often think, which is deep inside personal relations. And as far as relations are concerned, regulations are easily ignored.”